Laying Down Big Hands
By Todd Brunson, Cardplayer.com
As I mentioned in my last column, I placed 15th in the Doyle Brunson Classic, a WPT event held at Bellagio. Not only would it have been great to win my father’s tournament, but the first prize was $2.5 million! This is one of the biggest tournaments in the world outside the World Series of Poker. I had to settle for a little less than $100,000 as a consolation prize, unfortunately.
This was a great tourney. Jack McClelland started us with 30,000 in chips without starting the limits at 1,000-2,000 right off the bat. We also had 90-minute levels, so there was a lot of play. This was no all-in donkeyfest, which many formerly great events have become.
While I usually advocate an aggressive gambling style in tournaments, this type of tournament requires a more laid-back, selective style. Now, I’m not saying that you should play passively; I’m just saying that you have more time to pick your spots, so you should take it. I laid down more hands in this tournament than I have in the past year, literally.
That’s what this column is about, laying down big hands. It’s tough to know when to hold ‘em and when to fold ‘em, especially in a slow-paced tourney like this one.
I usually believe that when faced with a decision in a tournament, you’re always better off erring on the play side (calling or raising) as opposed to the laydown side. You normally don’t have much time, and may never see another big hand again before the antes eat you up.
This is what I hate about contemporary tournament poker. Any idiot who is aggressive enough can win a tournament with minimal poker-playing skill. Ever notice that many of these tournament champs get… continue reading at SwissPoker.ch